Search

Have Retail Funds Learned Nothing From Royal Commission?


Industry superannuation funds are claiming their retail superannuation fund counterparts appear to have learned little from the Royal Commission in circumstances where some bank and insurance company owned super funds are charging almost twice as much in fees.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has pointed to research it has commissioned from specialist ratings house SuperRatings comparing fees charged by retail superannuation funds to fees charged by profit to member industry funds.

It said the typical annual fee paid by someone with a $50,000 super balance in a High Growth investment option offered by a retail fund was $942 and that this compared to an average $591 in fees charged by a profit-to-member fund for the same product.

The AIST said the difference was even more stark for those wanting to put their superannuation into more defensive investment products, such as people approaching retirement.

It said the SuperRatings research had found that a person with a balance of $250,000 in a mostly cash invested ‘Secure’ option in a retail fund would be paying on average $3,255 per annum, or 274 per cent more for the same product in a profit-to-member fund.

The AIST pointed to the fact that as account balances increased, the fees for the profit-to-member sector became even more competitive, given the lower overall asset-based fees charged.

Commenting on the outcome, AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck said the report highlighted the need for regulators to provide tools that made it easy for members to compare fees and charges and make informed decisions about which super products were best for them.

“Currently, it is almost impossible for members of Choice funds to compare the fees and charges of their super fund. In the 21st century, this shouldn’t be that hard,” she said.

“Many members are paying almost double the fees for less returns on their retirement savings. It’s hard to see how the trustees of these funds can justify this in the post-Royal Commission environment.”

“People in low performing funds will be losing out on their superannuation and they won’t even know it. This is unacceptable.”

In terms of returns, the SuperRatings data showed that median profit-to-member MySuper funds delivered 6.47 per cent over the past three years to 31 December 2018, well above the 4.94 per cent achieved by the for-profit retail super funds.

The research noted the fact that historical comparisons between fees are harder now, given that the introduction of new fee and cost disclosure laws has changed the way funds disclose their fees.

Source: https://www.moneymanagement.com.au/news/superannuation/have-retail-funds-learned-nothing-royal-commission

By Mike Taylor

Money Management

15 April 2019

#SelfManagedSuperFund #SMSF #RoyalCommission

Recent Posts

See All

ASIC Should Withdraw Its SMSF Factsheet

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should withdraw its Self-Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSF) factsheet because it contains “an array of seemingly deliberate inaccuracies”, a

SMSFA Points To ASIC Fact Sheet Inconsistencies

The SMSF Association has criticised the corporate regulator’s focus on the risks of SMSFs in its mailout campaign targeting new trustees, saying the data sources used in its fact sheet are inconsisten

Shane Ellis Lawyers logo white.png